Rock Bottom.. Literally! MAC's Mineralized Skinfinishes

A few months ago I was rearranging my makeup stash and had a few of my MSFs in a container moved out into the kitchen so I could spread things out and organize things more efficiently.

Well, this was a BAD idea! I dropped them as I was walking, tripped, and they crashed to the floor pretty violently (funny image yet? LOL). I lost Petticoat, somewhat Porcelain Pink, Refined, and the one in the photo below, which is Cheeky Bronze.

Cheeky Bronze was not only my favorite of all of them, but it was also the most damaged from this Boo Boo!

What I find interesting, and why I'm even posting this, is the pan. At first, I kept thinking I could fix the cracked part onto the base somehow and continue using it. I had NO idea that was the clay base on which they're baked (or I assume that's what it's for).

As you can see, the clay base takes on the color and everything of the MSF making it appear as if it's part of the actual product.

Below is a photo with the cracked part lifted. You can see the clay disk in more detail, including the thickness of it.

This upcoming photo is what really intrigued me. I always thought to myself, "I'm spending that extra dough, ($28 for ones like I'm showing.. I have the MSF Natural which is $26, but I think they've got a normal metal aluminum pan/base) I guess I can rationalize the price because you get LOADS of product".

Well, once the dome broke off my Cheeky Bronze and discovered the clay pan, I realized that the dome, and therefore all of the product, is quite superficial and therefore doesn't go very deep into the packaging.

(photo be low- left, soft n' gentle/right, cheeky bronze)

I will say, it's not far from the truth as you get much more than a blush that's around 5-6g for $18 and the MSF is 10g, but compared to higher end blushes, (considering people see MAC as more midrange) it really isn't the BEST deal.

As evidenced by the photo above, the MAC MSF looks far more substantial, if you will, than the Benefit Coralista. However, Coralista comes in 11g, so 1g more than the MSF at the same cost.

By no means do I dislike my MSF's, and I will more than happily pay the price tag as they're beautiful to look at and get much use, but I now feel the MSF packaging is a little misleading.

Also, does anyone know why the MSF Natural doesn't have this clay base like the Special MSF's?

HD Powders and Flash Photography

One day I was catching up on twitter and I caught a tweet from Make Up For Ever, defending false accusations of their HD powder causing Celebrity makeup mishaps. Soon after I saw gossmakeupartist do a video on this to put the claims to rest.

Needless to say, his video proved it was, indeed, the MUFE HD powder that caused the flash photography "white cast" under Eva Longoria and Nicole Kidman's eyes.

Well, I decided to test this for myself, but take it a step further and test some other HD/Invisible loose setting powders, as well.

Products I'm Testing In This Review:

1. iT Cosmetics Bye Bye Pores (NEW)

2. E.L.F (eyeslipsface) HD Powder

3. Benefit Powderflage

4. MUFE (make up for ever) HD Powder

5. NEW- Laura Mercier Universal Invisible Loose Setting Powder

6. Bare Minerals Veil (regular and hydrating)

In the heavy swatch above (and I mean heavy like full on eyeshadow swatch just to be sure), I wouldn't blame the flash. I think it's proving this powder to be more opaque than a full on transluscent powder. I could visually see it without flash

Photos Above: Just to show you what it looks like swatched incredibly heavy without flash.

As you can see, once I took that swatch and buffed it with the brush (same brush used in the video review) you can barely see it. Definitely less than the MUFE HD even when I used a light hand with the MUFE and buffed it out really good (see bottom photo of this post).

Bye Bye Pores is almost invisible with flash, but left behind the area somewhat brightened (not white), which as I mentioned, helps with tired skin.

This proves the iT cosmetics has some coverage to it and may play part in how well it blurs. If you can see it in person, then you applied too much, so I think it's safe to say it passes the Flash test.

Here's another photo.

At Slightly Different Angles (to make sure)

By FAR the MUFE was the biggest culprit in causing a white cast on the skin. Second was the ELF HD, which I consider a great dupe to the MUFE, but now I say it's better because it's white cast isn't as offensive.

The other two powders (Powderflage and Laura Mercier) barely showed up, if at all, with the flash.

Which invisible loose powder wins? UPDATE

In my opinion, iT Cosmetics bye bye pores! It works amazingly on the face AND under the eyes. Second is Laura Mercier Universal which I do believe it's a new release (I got a sample w/ my order at Sephora).

The Powderflage is great, too, but meant just for under the eyes. I'm relieved to see that it doesn't cause the flash photography "no no", though!

Bare Minerals Added 1/27/11

I realized I didn't include my Bare Escentuals invisible powders! DUH me! The original mineral veil is completely invisible like the Laura Mercier, and the Hydrating one shows up slightly as there are tiny shimmers in it, but still pretty close to invisible.

A wonderful MUA and subscriber by the name of omgfuggeniloveit made a suggestion as to showing the results using a light handed approach, as all powders should be applied with a light hand. I couldn't agree more and having dry skin I learned to apply powders gingerly pretty early on.

In the photo above, I'm not sure I could see it if I didn't already know where I applied it, but knowing it's there I can detect it ever so slightly. It's more brightening instead of a full on white cast. I used my fluffy eye blending brush from flirt, which is what I use with my powderflage, for reference.

Here's a photo just at a different angle. I can still see it, but again, it's not nearly as offensive or garish as the celebrity red carpet mishap photos. I would still err on the side of caution, though, and go with other options.

Again, with any powder, silica based or not, always use a light hand. Never use a dense brush like a Kabuki, etc.

Olay Pro X Cleansing System vs. Clarisonic

Is the Olay Pro X Cleansing System a good alternative to the Clarisonic?

In my opinion? YES!

Does this mean I regret getting the Clarisonic? NOPE!

However, and in all honesty, I am glad I have both. Here are the Pro's and Con's of each product below:

Olay Pros over the Clarisonic:

1. It has a full and circular oscillating motion which moves debris more so than the Clarisonic, in my personal opinion.

2. It's extremely compact and much more ergonomic (and therefore more comfortable to hold) in terms of the grip for holding during use.

3. Sticking with the subject of size, the brush head maneuvers perfectly (and better than the Clarisonic I may add) in crevices around the nose, etc.

4. The bristles are very gentle, but effective. My new favorite thing to do is to mix a glycolic and pumpkin peel by thesourceskincare (link to the pumpkin and glycolic enzyme peel) with St. Ives Green Tea scrub and use the Olay to move it on my face. It's gentle enough that it doesn't scratch my face, but helps move the product around and remove dead skin cell debris. I do this only once a week.

5. The brush head doesn't splatter near as much as the Clarisonic!

6. I've not broken out using the Olay.

7. It seems to clean up much easier than the Clarisonic. However, using makeup remover will do the trick if either brush heads get residue.

Clarisonic Mia Pros over the Olay:

1. No battery issues (buying new ones over and over or having to use rechargeables). The Mia comes with a magnetic charge adapter which is convenient and more environmentally friendly.

2. It's completely waterproof. I don't think the Olay one is as rugged in that regard.

3. It has a timer so you don't over work your skin.

4. It has multiple brush head options unlike the Olay. I have both the normal and sensitive, but there is an even more gentle one called delicate.

5. The brush head comes with a cap to protect the bristles, where the Olay doesn't.

Now, in terms of refinement of my pores and smoothing the texture of my skin, I think both have delivered in that regard. I've not seen any miracles by any means, but dyspigmentation (brown spots) and other discoloration issues have waned quite a bit.

Overall, I love both of these products, but if you're on a budget the Olay one almost as good, and in some instances better than the Clarisonic. Both have their strengths!

Price of the Olay: $27-$30

Price of replacement brush heads: $9-$10 (it's recommended to replace them every 2-3 months, but I'll go based on how frayed or splayed the bristles get)

Where You Can Buy: Walgreens, Walmart, Rite Aid, CVS, and some Grocery Store Chains

Click Here For My Video Review

Fit Me Foundation and Oxidation.. or is it?

Tonight after reading on foundation oxidation and seeing so many contradictions, I coerced (lovingly) my husband to give me his hypothesis and had him help me round up some at home chemicals with different properties and pH's to do a casual experiment.

First of all, Brad's hypothesis was that the pigment was intensifying as it dried, so there was no chemical change, just that the fluid was evaporating, leaving a more concentrated product and therefore becoming darker or more orange.

Now, I didn't believe this entirely because it seemed to darken and to me that's a chemical change. Usually oils and/or adding liquid "intensifies" a pigment, which MUA's do all the time with eyeshadow.

This first lazy experiment I did on my own as I knew quite a few people would mention how oily skin may change the color. While some probably do, I have quite dry skin, so that wouldn't make sense with my personal situation.

What I did was add green tea seed oil to a petri dish and mixed it with the foundation (green tea "seed" oil is clear and won't add color).

Now, in this photo, the swab on the left looks slightly darker. At this point I was starting to think oil would change the overall color.

And THEN!

I swatched the two on white paper and I couldn't detect a difference in color.

In this next casual experiment, we took bleach, vinegar, a facial toner with alcohol, and Drano.

First of all, we took bleach and dropped it on the foundation as bleach is an intense oxidant. Second, toner or Sea Breeze was used, which contains alcohol-40. Thirdly, we used vinegar to see if it'd change the pH to a more acidic level. Lastly, we took Drano, which is very basic or high in pH (sodium hydroxide, a caustic substance).

Results?

NOTHING!

Nadda, ZILCH, Zero, None of the foundation droplets changed in any dramatic manner, whether it be more orange or darker.

The only thing I noticed (slightly) was the Sea Breeze toner and as you know Alcohol can cause liquid to evaporate more easily.

Conclusion. The only test which results in a darker or more orange foundation was the fact it DRIED. It had nothing to do with pH.

Top swatch is after ten minutes and bottom is around one. This is the only REAL swatch difference I see, and that is after it set/dried for awhile.

May I add that the ingredients in this foundation are extremely incredible for the fact it didn't react to ANY of these chemicals, harsh and all (completely inert). Interesting stuff and completely unexpected!

I am now coining this phenomenon, "the oompa loompa dry down"

Blog Sale!! USA ONLY (for now as I want to keep shipping cheap for everyone!)

Nars Eyeshadow in Silent Night (upper left is where I used it few times)

$12 PENDING

Mac e/s Suite in Counterparts (left)

MAC Mineralized e/s Duo in Fresh Green Mix SOLD

$8 each

Benefit Dallas

$15 SOLD

Nars Blush in Desire

$15 SOLD

MAC Mineralized Blush Duo LE in Moon River

$16 SOLD

Sephora Airbrush #55

$15 SOLD

YSL Palettes

4 Color Harmony #3 (left) PENDING

Duo #11 (right) PENDING

$8 each

MAC Mineral Duos

Engaging SOLD

Two To Glow

$10 each

Bobbi Brown Shimmer Brick in Pink- used 2-3x

$20 SOLD

Smashbox Bronzer in Haute-Couture (only swatched)

$5 SOLD

Victoria's Secret Lipstick in Whisper (worn 1-2x)

$5

Bobbi Brown Blush in French Pink

(worn 1-2x.. the photo shows it a little more berry than it is in person)

$8 SOLD

MAC Blush in Ambering Rose (worn once)

$8 SOLD

Smashbox Blush/Bronzer in Ecstasy (worn 3x)

$5 SOLD

MAC E/S All worn maybe 2x tops

Melton Mauve $7

Black Tied $9 SOLD

Birds & Berries $10

Pop Beauty Smokey Eyes Used 2x

$5 SOLD

Pop Beauty Day to Play- Used 1x

$6 SOLD

YSL Mat Touch Foundation (swatched only- way too dark)

$12 SOLD

Clinique Super Fit (used handful of times, now too dark)

#24 Champagne

$12

MAC MSF in Smooth Merge LE (barely used.. maybe 3-4x)

$25 SOLD

NYX 10 Color Runway Collection -Strike a Pose

(used 3-5x)

$6 SOLD

Benefit Boi-ing Concealer #2

(used handful of times - swiped off top layer and sanitized)

$10

MAC Lipsticks (all barely used)

Ahoy There! $8 SOLD

Utterly Frivolous $8, SOLD

Saint Germain $14 SOLD

Clinique Fresh Bloom LE- Bamboo Pink (used 3-5x)

$18

Benefit Georgia Used 3-4x- no brush

$15 SOLD

Benefit Thrrrob - no brush (used handful of x's)

$15 SOLD

Revlon ColorStay 98% Full (was backup)

$6

Revlon PhotoReady

Nude 90% full $7

Maybelline Super Stay 24 Hour

Classic Ivory 98%

Classic Beige used 1x PENDING

Natural Beige, 85%

$5 ea.

Neutrogena Healthy skin in 40 Nude

90% full $6

Korres Wild Rose Foundation in WRF2

used 5x $15

Nars Sheer Glow Santa Fe 95%+ (I had two)

$25 SOLD

All Foundations are Too Dark for me. I do recommend you research to find out if these shades will match you or if you own them already and need a back up.

$2 shipping for first item, $1 for each additional item 4+ items= Free Shipping

I'll ship first class with confirmation.

Message me on Youtube (ginabinawina99) what you are interested in and include your PayPal email for me to invoice.